Round MechanicsJune 22, 2026·9 min read

How Much to Raise, and What It Really Costs

The right raise is not the biggest one you can get. It is the smallest one that reaches a milestone worth a markup, because today's dollars are the most expensive you will ever sell.

Roast My Startup
The Roast My Startup firm
Investor-style feedback, written down

Founders ask how much they can raise. The better question is how little they need to, because the money you take today is the most expensive money you will ever take. If the company works, you are selling equity at the lowest price it will ever have. Every extra dollar raised now is paid for in a slice of a company that will, if all goes well, be worth far more later.

There are two opposite ways to get this wrong, and both are common. Raise too little and you run out before you reach the milestone that earns the next round, which forces you back into the market from a position of weakness. Raise too much and you hand over a large piece of the company, while quietly raising the bar you now have to clear to justify the price you just set. The right answer is a narrow target between those two failures.

Raise to a milestone, not to a number

The unit of a raise is not dollars. It is the next proof point. A round should buy enough time and money to reach a milestone that an investor will pay a markup for: a level of revenue, a retention curve, an unlocked channel, a shipped product with real usage. Work out what that milestone is, then raise what it costs to get there with a margin of safety, and not a dollar more by default. The rule of thumb most use is eighteen to twenty-four months of runway to a fundable milestone, because the next raise always takes longer than you expect.

Drag the sliders below to feel the trade you are actually making. The dilution is the slice you sell. The runway is what it buys. Watch how a bigger raise at the same valuation buys time at the cost of ownership, and how a higher valuation lets you raise more for the same dilution but only if you can later grow into it.

Interactive: what your raise actually costs

Set the raise, the post-money valuation, and your monthly burn. The dilution is the slice you sell; the runway is how long it buys you. The goal is the smallest round that reaches a milestone worth a markup.

$250k$40M
$2M$200M
$30k$1.50M
Dilution sold
15.0%
of the company, gone
Runway bought
13 mo
at this burn
Price per 1%
$100k
what each point costs
Who owns the company after this round
New investors
Founders, team, prior investors

Raising $1.50M at a $10M post-money sells 15.0% and buys about 13 months. That is a short runway. You will be back in the market before you have proof, which is the weakest time to raise.

The dilution you can feel, round after round

Dilution on a single round looks survivable. The problem is that it stacks. Each round sells another slice, the option pool eats more, and the founder's share compounds downward. The fifteen percent you sell at pre-seed and the twenty you sell at seed do not add to thirty-five, they multiply, and by Series A a founding team that was not careful can already be a minority of its own company.

How founder ownership compounds downward
Day onefounders 100%the founders own all of it
After pre-seedfounders 85%sold ~15%
After seedfounders 64%another ~20% plus an option pool
After Series Afounders 45%another ~20%, dilution compounds
Illustrative path for a team that raises a typical pre-seed, seed, and Series A. Each round looks reasonable alone. The shrinking amber bar is why over-raising early is so expensive: you pay for it again at every round that follows.

Why a bigger round can be the worse deal

A bigger raise at a higher valuation feels like winning, and sometimes it is. But the valuation you take is a promise about the future. If you raise at a price your next round cannot beat, you have set yourself up for a flat or down round, which is corrosive to morale, to the cap table, and to your own leverage. A smaller round at a sane price that you comfortably grow past is worth more than a trophy valuation you spend two years trying to justify.

There is also a behavioral cost. Money invites burn. A larger balance quietly expands the plan, the hiring, and the office, until the runway you thought you bought is shorter than the spreadsheet promised. The discipline of raising to a milestone is partly a discipline against your own future spending, which ties directly to whether you stay default alive.

The runway math nobody does honestly

Runway is the raise divided by your net monthly burn, but the honest version accounts for the fact that burn grows as you hire into the plan the round was meant to fund. Model the burn you will actually run, not today's, then add a buffer of several months on top, because raising the next round will take longer and start later than you want it to. A forecast that assumes a flat burn and an on-time next raise is not a plan, it is optimism with a cell reference. We took that argument apart in the numbers that kill a seed round.

How to size it

  1. Name the milestone that earns a markup. Be specific: a revenue level, a retention number, a channel that pays back. If you cannot name it, you are not ready to size the round.
  2. Cost the plan that reaches it, with the burn you will actually run, then add a six-month buffer for the next raise being slower than you hope.
  3. That total is your floor. It is the smallest honest number, not the biggest you could get.
  4. Check the dilution. If reaching the milestone needs more than about 25 percent in one round, the milestone is too far for a single round; cut it down or stage it.
  5. Only then think about valuation, and prefer a price you can clearly beat next time over the highest one on offer.

Sizing a round well is really a forecasting problem wearing a fundraising costume: it depends on burn, growth, and the crossover between them. If you want a firm of quantitative analysts to pressure-test the model underneath your raise, find the real runway, and tell you whether the milestone is reachable on the money you are asking for, that is what the forecast review inside Roast My Startup is built to do.

dilutionvaluationrunwayfundraising

Find the holes before an investor does

Roast My Startup is a firm of AI analysts that tears apart your deck, model, forecast, and data room, then tells you exactly what an investor would use to pass. Brutal first, constructive second.

Keep reading

ForecastForecast Only What You Have Proven (Investors Delete the Rest)When you raise a seed or Series A, investors mentally erase every unproven line in your forecast and judge you on what is left. Build the model on proven revenue, because speculative revenue reads as risk, not ambition.Read OutreachHow to Reach Investors, and Why the Warm Intro Is OverratedThe warm intro raises your odds, but it is a weight on a scale, not a gate. A specific cold email from a founder who has done the work beats a lukewarm referral. Here is how to write one that gets answered.Read TractionWhat Actually Counts as Traction at SeedTraction is not a number that goes up. It is evidence the number will keep going up after you stop pushing. A guide to durable traction versus the vanity metrics investors quietly discount.Read ProcessRun Your Raise Like a Process, Not a LotteryA fundraise is a sales process with you as the product. Founders who run it sequentially and hope lose to founders who run it in parallel, on a clock, with a real pipeline. Here is how to run it.Read InvestorsChoosing Investors: The Cap Table Is ForeverYou will spend years with your lead investor and you cannot fire them. A guide to choosing investors for the relationship after the wire, not the size of the check or the logo on the term sheet.Read ThesisNon-Consensus and Right: The Only Way to Win a Funding RoundGreat startups are built on a contrarian truth that turns out to be correct. Here is why being non-consensus and right is the only quadrant that pays, and how to tell a real secret from a bad idea.Read ThesisThe Case for Being Roasted Before You PitchPraise is the most expensive thing a founder can buy. The market only tells you the truth after it has already decided to pass. The fix is to manufacture an honest adversary on purpose.Read SurvivalDefault Alive: The Only Forecast Number That Survives a DownturnDefault alive is the single question that decides whether your startup controls its own fate: would you reach profitability on your current growth and burn before the money runs out, if you never raised again?Read Data RoomWhat a Data Room Actually SignalsA startup data room is not storage, it is a credibility test you take before anyone opens a file. Here is what its structure quietly tells investors, and a minimal room that signals you are ready.Read TimingWhy Now: The Question That Separates a Company From a FeatureThe 'why now' question decides whether you have a company or a feature. Here is how investors read startup timing, and how to prove the window is open instead of asserting it.Read ForecastThe Numbers That Kill a Seed Round: Reading a Forecast Like a VCFounders model hope, investors model decay. These five numbers in a startup financial forecast quietly decide whether the rest of the model gets read.Read Business ModelThe Moat Question: What Stops Anyone Else From Doing ThisEvery investor eventually asks what stops a competitor from copying you. Here is how to think about a startup moat, why defensibility compounds, and the difference between a real moat and a head start.Read Pitch DeckHow to Pressure-Test Your Pitch Deck Before You RaiseYour pitch deck is not a document, it is an argument. Here is a repeatable way to red-team your deck and find the holes before an investor uses them to pass.Read TeamFounder-Market Fit: Why ‘Why You’ Is the Hardest Question to FakeInvestors ask ‘why you’ to test founder-market fit. Here is what they are actually scoring, why resume logos barely count, and how to show the earned insight that makes you the right team for this market.Read FundraisingWhy Investors Pass, and Why It Is Almost Never the IdeaA pass is a verdict on your thinking, not your market. Here are the real reasons VCs say no, and why most of them are smaller and more fixable than founders expect.Read